Marine leaders are considering expanding the Corps' mission in Ukraine by training local troops who could be tasked with taking on Russian-backed separatists.The Marine Corps could expand its training of Ukrainian forces as leaders following a summer exercise in which Marines schooled that nation’s army in skills they could take to the fight.

Marines could deploy to the Eastern European country to train the Ukrainian naval infantry, said Capt. Richard Ulsh, a spokesman for Marine Corps Forces Europe and Africa. Marine officials have future hopes to begin training the Ukrainian Naval Infantry – that nation’s version of the U.S. Marine Corps, Ulsh said.

The move would follow a July 25 announcement by the State Department that the U.S. military would expand its mission in the country to include training conventional forces. U.S. troops were previously only authorized to train Ukrainian national guardsmen.

It also follows an recent 11-day exercise the Marine Corps concluded in Ukraine in late July. About 56 Marines from Minnesota-based 4th Law Enforcement Battalion participated in Exercise Saber Guardian, a multinational exercise. 

Saber Guardian involved aAbout 1,800 military personnel from the U.S. and several European partners participated in Saber Guardian. The exercise was held at the International Peacekeeping and Security Center outside near Yavoriv in western Ukraine, near Poland — far from front-line fighting in Crimea. 

The most recent Marine training mission in Ukraine occurred from July 20-31 during a multi-national exercise. "We had 56 Marines from 4th Law Enforcement Battalion take part in Exercise Saber Guardian," Ulsh said.

State Department officials said if more U.S. troops head to Ukraine to train members of its military, they also will also be far from the front lines. 

"As with the training that's just concluding with the national guard, it's going to be in western Ukraine, near Poland, near the Poland border," State Department deputy spokesman Mark Toner told reporters July 24.

Marine officials said the training during Saber Guardian was focused on nonlethal tactics rather than y the training was not focused on direct combat skills, but a Washington think tanker says it could still help them fight Russian-backed separatists. There was a "small group of Marines there providing non-lethals training - that's the bulk of it," said Capt. Richard Ulsh, a Marine Corps Forces Europe and Africa spokesman.

But, Luke Coffey, a former Army captain who's now a fellow at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C., says that any training – even in non-lethals -- is a boon for Ukrainians troops who could travel east into the front-line fight.

"One interesting point is the [U.S. military] is always quick to stress that training is far from the front and non-lethal," Coffey said. "The U.S. always says this as a way to not raise tensions with Russia," Luke Coffey, a former Army captain who’s now a fellow at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, said. They said the same thing about Georgia – ‘We’re training Georgia in counter-insurgency to go to Afghanistan, not to get ready to fight with Russia.’"All this sounds nice and plays well, but the reality is the training can be applied to Russian separatists in Ukraine, even if it is not directly focused on those issues."

No matter what Marines are training foreign forces in, there are common skills: shoot, move, communicate, make decisions. Even "drill and ceremony" training helps with that, Coffey said.

While details are scant about what training Marines might offer Ukrainian naval infantrymen, that raises the possibility of training in other facets of military operations that could hone skills Ukrainian forces are more likely to employ in lethal combat.But even nonlethal training will prove useful on the chaotic front near the Crimean peninsula,  battlefield of eastern Ukraine, where fighters are mixed with civilian populations, requiring training and gear to employ everything from light non-lethal to unbridled lethal tactics.

The need for nonlethal tactics and equipment on complex battlefields is a point Marine leaders emphasized It is a point that was made by Marine leaders during a Sept. 22 panel discussion during the at Modern Day Marine expo in aboard Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia. There, Lt. Gen. Ronald Bailey, deputy commandant for Plans, Policies and Operations, used a photo from Ukraine, depicting what appear to be uniformed Russian troops standing in formation with men in jeans and sneakers, toting AK-47s, to illustrate the types of hybrid threats that are becoming increasingly common.

Marines are likely to find themselves in that sort of a fight in the future where on a single urban battlefield they face a fusion of tactics and military weaponry from insurgents and conventional military forces including an Iraq-style insurgency and nation-state military capabilities.

Ukrainian forces already operate in that environment, Coffey said, and Marines' counterinsurgency knowledge could prove useful to those troops.

Ukrainian serviceman patrol near the chemical plant in Avdeevka, Donetsk region, on June 20, 2015. Russia on June 20 slammed the EU's extension of sanctions over its annexation of Crimea as "blackmail" and vowed it would not be pressured into returning the peninsula to Ukraine. AFP PHOTO/ ALEKSEY CHERNYSHEV (Photo credit should read ALEKSEY CHERNYSHEV/AFP/Getty Images)

Ukrainian servicemen patrol near the chemical plant in Avdeevka, a town just north of the city of Donetsk, on June 20. Ukrainian troops face threats from insurgents and conventionally trained forces.

Photo Credit: Aleskey Chernyshev/AFP

"Basically what the Ukrainian military is fighting is an insurgency. The location, culture and language are different than in Afghanistan or western Iraq, but nevertheless it is an insurgency, so Marines have a lot to offer," he said. "The Marines have a decade of COIN experience from Anbar and Helmand," he said, referring to provinces in Iraq and Afghanistan, respectively.

When asked if U.S. training of the Ukrainian military constitutes a proxy war when juxtaposed to Russian training and equipping of separatists, Coffey said no. Russia is much more heavily vested in the conflict. While Ukraine is of critical strategic importance to Russia, Ukraine falls outside of NATO and lacks the same mutual defense member nations enjoy.

"Russia is in it to win it. The U.S. has sent just a few dozen trainers," he said.

Share:
In Other News
Load More